Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground

That's The Washington Post's headline about a new CIA report on world terrorism.

OK, let me get this straight. America invades Afghanistan, defeats the Taliban and liberates the country. That's good. But disperses al Qaeda terrorists around the world. That's bad.

Then the US invades Iraq, defeats Saddam and liberates the country. That's good. But now Iraq "is a magnet for international terrorist activity", and all the terrorists are gathering in one place. That's bad.

Now wait just a damn minute, which is it?

Make up your damn minds leftoids, do you or do you not want all the freaking terrorists in one place?

Look at the astounding insight of the WaPo.

Iraq provides terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills," said David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats. "There is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries."

So, killing as many as we can in one place is a good thing and dispersing them is a bad thing, right?

President Bush has frequently described the Iraq war as an integral part of U.S. efforts to combat terrorism. But the council's report suggests the conflict has also helped terrorists by creating a haven for them in the chaos of war.

For Pete's sake (by the way who is Pete anyway), will you guys please just make up your damn mind!

This is one reason I gave up listening to anti-war types a long time ago, they just don't make any sense.

Killing as many terrorists as you can in one place is a good thing, period. Zarqawi admitted that when he called for help.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------