Monday, October 16, 2006

US - Lawyer Is Due for Sentencing in Terror Case

Despite her conviction on terrorism charges, The New York Times comes to her defense.

Today, 20 months after she was convicted on terror charges, Ms. Stewart and two co-defendants who were convicted of conspiring with her will be sentenced in Federal District Court in Manhattan. Prosecutors, arguing that Ms. Stewart repeatedly flouted the law to aid the violent designs of an imprisoned terrorist client, have asked Judge John G. Koeltl to condemn her to 30 years in prison.


"Arguing"? She's been convicted already. The sympathy continues.

That would be a life sentence for Ms. Stewart, who turned 67 last week.


Cry me a river. She should have thought about that before she aided terrorists. The Times blubbering goes on.

Her dread of prison deepened unexpectedly, Ms. Stewart said, during the long period after a jury found her guilty on Feb. 10, 2005, of providing material aid to terrorism. She has recently recovered from breast cancer, but fears it will return in prison.


Now prison causes breast cancer?

And if the judge comes down hard, she could be held in solitary confinement with limited visits, the same conditions as Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the terrorist she was convicted of aiding.


As she should be.

I feel very threatened by it,” Ms. Stewart said. “I know too much about the way they deal with you in prison.”


Boo, freeking hoo. We are threatened by Muslim terrorists and those who aid them like Ms. Stewart.

Read the rest if you must.

No comments:

 
Brain Bliss