Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The great left wing conspiracy

Exposed here.

More here and here.

Now you know how the Democrats and the media coordinate their message.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Be wary of Muslims bearing gifts

Take Ali Eteraz's gift here for example.

"Sheikh Abdul Hakim Murad is perhaps the most significant British Muslim leader around. It is too bad that so few people know about him. Now that he has launched the Cambridge Muslim College, which is designed to train "local" specialists in Islamic knowledge who are able to "celebrate their identity" as British and Muslim, he should be given his due and treated like a national asset."


High praise indeed. I'm not familiar with his work and in fact, this is the first I've heard of him. Perhaps he does good work but if this is an indication of his thinking, there may be cause for concern. Speaking of Iran's Ahmedinejad, Murad had this to say:

"God's love and generosity ensures that anyone, however unpromising, can be a saviour, at least at times. Even eccentric Iranian presidents can have a go."


So to Murad, Ahmedinejad is "eccentric" and can be a "saviour". This is the same Ahmedinejad who vows to wipe Israel off the map and exterminate all Jews.

Perhaps this explains Eteraz's love of Murad. Or could it be the fact that Murad is in fact Timothy Winter a Western convert to Islam? Leaving this aside what to make of Eteraz himself?

On bin Laden Eteraz has this to say: "That is when untutored demagogues like Bin Laden and Bakri Muhammad strike."

If only bin Laden had been trained by Murad 9/11 wouldn't have happened!

Eteraz goes on to allege Murad condemned the 9/11 Muslim terrorists.

"Murad remained true to his message after 9/11. "Terrorists are not Muslims," he wrote shortly after the attacks. His condemnation of the hijackers was immediate and loud – and he was perhaps alone among the Islamic intellegentsia in arguing that the hijackers be excommunicated."


Follow the link and read what Murad actually said.

"Why is there so much hatred of the United States, and so much yearning to poke it in the eye? Are the architects of policy sane in their certainty that America can enrage large numbers of people, but contain that rage forever through satellite technology and intrepid double-agents? Businessmen and bankers will now start to read carefully enough to discern that it is not US national interest, but the power of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, that tends to drive Washington’s policy in the world’s greatest troublespot."


Starting to see through the wolf in sheeps clothing yet? You see, 9/11 was America's fault and more particularly American Jews fault.

Eteraz goes on to note how Murad condemns attacks on Jews. Really? Here's a letter by Murad that Eteraz offers as proof of Murad's defense of Jews.

"The ongoing killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza by Israeli forces has angered us all.

However, this does not, and cannot, justify attacks on our fellow citizens of Jewish faith and background here in Britain.

Most Muslims are completely against such behaviour. However, we call on all Muslims to continue to remain vigilant against attempts to bring our own faith and community into disrepute. British Jews should not be held responsible for the actions of the Israeli government."


Apparently Israeli Jews are fair game but not British Jews. In other words, don't draw attention to us here while we're busy converting Britain to Islam.

Eteraz's love of Murad tells us a lot about Eteraz but so too do Eteraz's own words.

"Instead, quite absurdly, young Muslims are encouraged to emulate non-Muslims and rightwing hacks."


According to Eteraz it is absurd for young Muslims to emulate non-Muslims such as Barack Obama. Or is he saying that all non-Muslims are equal to "rightwing hacks".

I'm all for and end to radical Islam and Muslim terrorists. I'm all against the spread of Islam and those who use Islam as an excuse to attack Jews and blame them for all the evils of the world. And I'm always wary of Muslims bearing gifts.

Obama drops the term terrorism

Guantanamo bay inmates are no longer "enemy combatants", the war on terror is gone and now, even the word terrorism is gone.

"I presume there is always a threat from terrorism. In my speech, although I did not use the word "terrorism," I referred to "man-caused" disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur."


That make sense to you? Nah, me neither.

I love this next bit.

"SPIEGEL: This sounds quite different from what we heard from the Bush administration. How will the new anti-terror policy differ from the previous one?

Napolitano: Our policies will be guided by authoritative information. We also have assets at our disposal now that we did not have prior to 9/11. For example, we are much better able to keep track of travellers coming into the US than we were before. The third thing is to work with our international partners and allies to make sure that we are getting information and sharing information in an appropriate and real-time fashion."


She has all of that thanks to Bush and co, so how exactly does this differ from Bush's policies?

These people say these things with a straight face and they believe them. Obama and his team are making the world less safe day by day.

'There's no honour in Muslim murder

Britain growing a pair?

Check this out.

"He banned publication of anything that could identify the three children but said it was 'important to an understanding of the case to note that the parents are both Muslims and that both the paternal and maternal families originate from Pakistan.'

The father was told he could not appeal against the decision to place the children with non-Muslim foster parents. If they were placed with a Muslim family, it was likely their mother's family would find out where they were, the court heard."

junk food confiscated at primary school

Can Britain get any more of a nanny state?

Fundamentals of the Economy Are Sound

Who said that? McCain? Nope. Obama.

If that's true then Obama can't claim he inherited a mess from Bush.

"The Internet ate my newspaper."

Until newspapers stop their left wing cheer leading we'll see a lot more of this. But I don't hold out much hope for that.

Obama to Charge Wounded Heroes for Treatment

Nothing Obama does surprises me.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

George Galloway stoned in Egypt

Hehe, no, no, he wasn't on dope. He is a dope however.

The Times reports on the Palestinian terrorists poster boy.

"A convoy led by the maverick MP George Galloway carrying supplies for Gaza has been attacked in Egypt, apparently injuring several people travelling in his party.

The convoy, carrying aid worth £1 million, was pelted with stones and vandalised with anti-Hamas slogans after it stopped overnight in El-Arish, a small town around 28 miles from the Rafah border crossing with Gaza. "


Note this happend at Egypt's closed border with Gaza and not Israels. Not many people know, thanks to the left wing media, that Egypt closed its border with Gaza the same time Israel did.

Is Obama drifting?

The BBC's Justin Webb joins the hand wringing.

Webb starts out saying Obama is worse than Jimmy Carter. He's right.

Far from it: the reaction when he pulled out on Tuesday makes that clear. Whether he was the right man or not is way above my pay grade, but the failure to notice that he was a tad controversial and/or the failure to back the guy once the going got tough really does seem to be a sign of incoherence and drift at the heart of the administration. This is, after all, a key post."


Well Webb, you and your left wing media cohorts anointed Obama. Maybe if you guys had spent more time investigating Obama than trying to dig up dirt or Palin or smear McCain, we might not be in this mess.

Israel row derails Obama nominee

Or so the BBC would have you believe.

"The Obama administration's candidate for a top US intelligence post has withdrawn, after his past criticism of Israel came under heavy fire. "


Is that the only reason Auntie? I see the BBC is still the world's largest terror supporting propaganda machine.

Even Bush haters know this was a monumental blunder by Obama.

"The most extreme manifestation of Freeman's realist ideology came out in a leaked e-mail he sent to a foreign policy Internet mailing list. Freeman wrote that his only problem with what most of us call "the Tiananmen Square Massacre" was an excess of restraint:

"[T]he truly unforgivable mistake of the Chinese authorities was the failure to intervene on a timely basis to nip the demonstrations in the bud, rather than -- as would have been both wise and efficacious -- to intervene with force when all other measures had failed to restore domestic tranquility to Beijing and other major urban centers in China. In this optic, the Politburo's response to the mob scene at 'Tian'anmen' stands as a monument to overly cautious behavior on the part of the leadership, not as an example of rash action."


Now, if the BBC had reported that, it would have ate into their Israel is the root of all evil and the Joooos control everything.

I have a friend who insists the Jews control the world. I asked him if the Jews control the BBC? No he replied. Do you still think the Jews control the world I asked? Of course he replied. I find most people who are anti Israeli suffer from the same detachment from reality.

Students end Gaza sit-in protest

Interesting these types never protest about the Palestinian terrorists firing over 80 rockets a day into Israel.

Wonder why these types never protest at Egypt's closing of its border with Gaza at the same time the Israelis did?

Notice too how the BBC spread Palestinian propaganda.

"More than 1,300 Palestinians, including 400 children, were killed after Israel began its land, sea and air operations against Hamas militants on 27 December."


Says who? Why Palestinian terrorists, that's who.

Man acquitted of break-in murder

Never should have been charged in the first place. That fact that he was speaks volumes about the UK.

Why is everyone surprised at Obama?

See here.

Obama is exactly who we knew he was before he was elected - the far most left Senator with zero experenice.

Obama team 'unreachable'

Now Obama's not even "present".

"But yesterday, Sir Gus O'Donnell, Britain's most senior civil servant, exposed transatlantic tension when he protested that Downing Street was finding it "unbelievably difficult" to plan for next month's G20 summit in London because of problems tracking down senior figures in the US administration. "There is nobody there. You cannot believe how difficult it is," the Cabinet Secretary told a civil service conference in Gateshead. "

Friday, November 21, 2008

Obama Advisers To Public: Temper Expectations

He lied.

"CHICAGO (CBS) ― President-elect Barack Obama and his inner circle fear that some voters expect him to turn around the economy, wind down the war in Iraq and, perhaps, cure cancer -- all by the Fourth of July.

They know they must manage and lower those expectations, CBS 2 Political Editor Mike Flannery reports. "

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Friday, November 14, 2008

Bill Ayers: Barack Obama a 'family friend'

But according to Obama, Ayers was "just a guy who lives in my neighbourhood.

"In a new afterword to his memoir, 1960s radical William Ayers describes himself as a "family friend" of President-elect Barack Obama and writes that the campaign controversy over their relationship was an effort by Obama's political enemies to "deepen a dishonest narrative" about the candidate.

Ayers describes phone threats and hate e-mail he received during the campaign, and he bemoans Obama's guilt by association.

During the campaign, Ayers' friendship with Obama was a favorite subject of conservative bloggers and talk show hosts who insisted the two were closer than the candidate was admitting. Ayers' new description of the relationship seems to contradict Obama's statements."


Remember, Ayers is a home grown terrorist who said on 9/11 he wished he had bombed more.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Barack Obama is looking more like a realist

Aw, you mean "The One" can't live up to the left wing media's expectations?

"Reporting from Washington -- Now that the confetti has fallen, the nascent administration of Barack Obama has come face to face with one of its biggest challenges: living up to the exceptionally high expectations his thrilling campaign produced among supporters and long-suffering Democrats."


Don't be so modest LA Times, you and the rest of the media were the cheerleaders for Obama and as such are just as responsible for the false expectations generated.
 
Brain Bliss