Why do I say they should read it? Listen to this:
Among the high-profile targets suggested [by the Encyclopaedia ] are the "Statue of Liberty, Eiffel Tower and Big Ben clock".
Far fetched you say? Not surprising you feel that way since the British media don't want you to know that just such an attack failed on 9/11.
BOMBAY (AFX) - An Indian court has jailed a man for plotting to crash passenger jets into the House of Commons and the Tower Bridge in London on Sept 11, 2001, Agence France-Presse reported.
Guy lost his nerve and bolted along with 7 accomplices who are still at large.
And does this sound familiar from the Encyclopaedia:
Targets where there would be bigger loss of life are suggested as "skyscrapers, ports, airports, nuclear plants, football stadiums and large congregations at Christmas".
It should, those are the same targets the Muslim terrorists arrested in Italy last week, were planning to attack.
Italian authorities recently announced that they had used wiretaps to uncover the conspiracy to conduct a series of major attacks inside the U.S.
Italian Interior Minister Giuseppe Pisanu said the planned attacks would have targeted stadiums, ships and railway stations, and the terrorists' goal, he said, was to exceed the devastation caused by 9/11.
Didn't know about the wiretap angle on the bust? That's because the media don't want you to know. It would support Bush's position and heaven knows the media would never do that. Even if it saved your life.
Besides, the BBC, in its show "The Power of Nighmares" told you Bush made up all this stuff about world wide terror networks anyway. Which is one reason I developed My Case Against the BBC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment