The New York Post says this:
"Dunlap and a man claiming to be a lawyer showed The Post about 90 seconds of 43-minute tape, saying it was legally obtained and that Ashley was aware she was being filmed. The Post refused to pay for the video.
The video, which the shooter initially hoped to sell for $2 million before scaling back his price to $400,000, shows a 20-something woman with light skin and long brown hair taking a red straw from her mouth, bending over a desk, inserting the straw into her nostril and snorting lines of white powder. "
The Post goes on to say at one point the woman even waves at the camera. And this really sent my BS meter off.
"The lawyers said the shooter used a camera with a hard-disc drive that he later destroyed, drilling into the device and tossing it into a lake. "
Why would you want to destroy the evidence?
Radar.com, who also claims to have viewed the tape, says this:
"The man hands her a rolled-up dollar bill and she proceeds to walk a few steps to a table where the cocaine is cut. She pulls her hair back, bends down and snorts a line."
And
"The tape was made without her knowledge. It is being shopped for $250,000. "
Radar also notes the story is in a major British newspaper but I couldn't find it.
Perhaps the two reporters saw different tapes or different parts of the same tape.
As I said, I have no way of knowing if this is true and some red flags went up for me, but we'll see.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment