Listen carefully to what Rather says.
RATHER: Well, without getting into that because the panel, this panel that was chosen by CBS to look into it, they issued their report. CBS adopted the report. I said at the time and I say now, I read the report. I absorbed it. I carried forward in my work. Anybody wants to know the panel's version of what happened should read the report.
"I absorbed it".
Now comes the lie.
...this [CBS] panel came forward and what they concluded, among the things they concluded after months of investigation and spending millions of dollars, they could not determine that the documents were fraudulent. Important point, that we don't know whether the documents were fraudulent or not.
That is an outright lie and Rather knows it because he "absorbed" the CBS report. A report by the way that concluded:
Tytell concluded, for the reasons described below, that (i) the relevant portion of the Superscript Exemplar was produced on an Olympia manual typewriter, (ii) the Killian documents were not produced on an Olympia manual typewriter, and (iii) the Killian documents were produced on a computer in Times New Roman typestyle . Tytell acknowledged that deterioration in the Killian documents from the copying and downloading process made the comparison of typestyles "to some extent a subjective call." However, he believed the differences were sufficiently significant to conclude that the Killian documents were not produced on a typewriter in the early 1970s and therefore were not authentic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 comments:
proteccion investors instytut published nancysufl calle helper exact kajer phenomenon discussion
servimundos melifermuly
tampering scouts seller prescriptive monetise nascent weis unchs rumours moulded seminars
servimundos melifermuly
Post a Comment