US - 'War on terror' loses clear direction

So says the BBC, more precisely, the BBC's Paul Reynolds. Being anti-American, the BBC would say that, now wouldn't they.

Watch this sleight of hand Paul pulls here.

In the five years since 9/11, a clear-cut and well-supported "war on terror" declared by President Bush has become confused and divisive.

Whereas Le Monde declared the day after 9/11: "We are all Americans now", a placard at a demonstration in London recently read: "We are all Hezbollah now".

Le Monde, is a French newspaper and not a country and last time I checked London was a city in Britain. That's a big difference and here's why.

Paul is attempting to show how drastically things have chagned. What he leaves out is that when news of the 9/11 attacks reached London, Muslims cheered and hailed the Muslim terrorists as heros - in 2001 London was already Londonistan. Some of the support for the attack came from al Qaeda in London.

In July 2001, just prior to the attack, several Arab men taking flight training in Arizona aroused the suspicions of the FBI. When they investigated, they found several had ties to al Qaeda in London. This is one of the failures of the intelligence community to stop 9/11.

Britain's policy of multiculturalism coupled with its turning a blind eye to terror recruiters, gave the world a whole host of terrorists.

So, in reality, Paul, not much as changed in London.

As for the "We are all Hezbollah now", Paul fails to mention the media's near total fabrication of their reports from Lebanon.

In his next paragraph Paul tries to fool you with the BBC party line on the current situation in Afghanistan.

American policy has had successes. The quick war in Afghanistan after 9/11 (now flaring up again in the south) toppled the Taleban...

Anyone following the story, other than through the BBC, knows that the current situation is not one of the Taleban on offense but quite the reverse. The Taleban is on the run and being killed at a tremendous rate. Of an estimated force of 2000, 900 of already been killed and recent reports suggest 700 are now trapped and being hunted down.

And Paul, like Peter Taylor in his "al Qaeda: Time to talk", seems to have missed the BBC's stance in "The Power of Nightmares", that al Qaeda is a "myth" and "illusion".

Yet Western and other publics are left in fear, and rightly so. Al-Qaeda is no invention.

That's odd Paul, that's not whatthe BBC says here.

Paul it would seem that the war on terror has at least helped the BBC find a clear direction. Peter wants to talk to them and you admit al Qaeda is no invention.

Paul then begins a drumbeat as if marching a death row inmate to the gallows. Glaringly missing from all of this is any mention of the BBC's bias and outright fabrications. There's no way Paul or anyone at the BBC is going to admit that but someone has to be to blame so Paul, the good BBC man he is, says this:

But Iraq has probably been the greatest single factor in producing the confusion that is now evident.

No Paul. The geatest single factor in that regard is the lying left wing media. Read the link above to the BBC's fabrications and you find the following:

1. Paul Adams, the BBC's defense correspondent complaining that the BBC is lying in their coverage of the war in Iraq.

2. Twice the BBC were caught using well known anti-war protesters to fabricate alleged war crime stories against Americans. One was even a jounalist for the Guardian!

3. The BBC's John Simpson was caught lying about Iraq casualties.

4. The BBC were caught fabricating a story alleging UK Army desertions over Iraq.

5. The BBC's John Simpson says al Qaeda is the "resistance"

6. The BBC's John Simposon called the 7/7 Muslim terrorists "misguided criminals".

The list is long.

Paul continues his sleight of hand.

A difficulty for the Bush administration is that it argued differently when the invasion was announced. Then, it was about weapons of mass destruction.

This is a common tactic used by the left - draw attention to one reason - the most contentious - for going to war and ignore the others. Read Bush's address to he UN before the invasion where he layed out all his reasons, not just WMD.

Paul's last few paragrpahs shows he has no clue what the war on terror is all about. He talks about South Vietnam and the Israel/Palestinian confilts in terms of geography. The war on terror is about geography only in the sense of where we are currently fighting and where Muslims want to establish the caliphate.

The BBC's left wing agenda, support of Muslim terrorists and fabricated reporting, proves it is the BBC that has lost its "clear direction".

How much more united would the western world be if it weren't for the left wing media?