It is four weeks since bombers indiscriminately killed and maimed ordinary Londoners. Protecting London from terrorists requires the best possible policing - which, in turn, needs the greatest possible flow of information from all communities. It also demands that we shrink the pool of the alienated that bombers draw on by treating all communities as equal parts of British society - not only theoretically, but in reality. And it means withdrawing from Iraq. All are interrelated.
Perhaps mad red Ken can explain why Muslim terrorist planned to fly an airplane into Parliament on 9/11/2001 - years before Afghanistan and Iraq?
Notice how red Ken is careful to call them bombers and not Muslim terrorists, which they were.
Mad red Ken goes on to spread terrorist propaganda.
The Iraqi people see US policy in practice. Successive US administrations showed no interest in Iraqi democracy - so long as Saddam Hussein gassed Iranians, Kurds or other US opponents he was supplied with weapons and other support. Only when he struck a US ally was he opposed.
Mad red Ken fails to mention who supplied Saddam with those weapons. Now why do you suppose that is?
What kind of tanks did Saddam have? T55 and some T72's - Russian.
What kind of planes did Saddam have? Mig's - Russian. Mirage - French
What kind of helicopters did Saddam have? Gazelle's - French
What kind of rifles did Saddam have? AK47's - Russian
Here is a more extensive post on the subject with links to a breakdown of who armed Saddam - it wasn't America.
After the 2003 invasion, when US troops were deployed to protect the oil ministry while looting gripped Iraq, when key reconstruction contracts were awarded to US companies, Iraqis understood what was in store for them. US forces cannot win over Iraq's population because the formally stated democratic goals of the forces have nothing to do with the actual policy pursued.
Just how ignorant is mad red Ken and more importantly how ignorant does he think the British public is?
London's mad mayor seems to have forgotten that 8 million Iraqis voted and now have their first democratically elected government - no thanks to London's mad mayor.
And he continues his propaganda piece for the terrorists.
That is also why al-Qaida, previously without a presence in Iraq, now has a strong base there - damaging the fight against international terrorism.
At least that's what London's mad mayor wants you to think despite all the evidence to the contrary.
London's mad mayor then goes on to defend his invitation to Sheikh Qaradawi with some moral equivalance that will make you sick. Yes this same Qaradawi.
Qaradawi supports female genital mutilation, wife-beating, the execution of homosexuals, destruction of the Jewish people, suicide bombing of innocent civilians, and the punishment of rape victims who do not dress with sufficient modesty.
And mad red Ken plays the Palestinian card with some more propaganda.
But if supporters of the Palestinians should be banned on the grounds that Palestinians kill civilians, then consistency would require banning Israeli leaders, who have been responsible for killing several times more Palestinian civilians. Someone advocating that both Sharon and Qaradawi be banned would be wrong, but at least they would be consistent.
What mad Ken doesn't tell you is that since Palestinian terrorists never wear a uniform, how can you tell if they are civilian or not? And notice mad Ken doesn't quote any sources to back up his propaganda which is refuted here and here.
Mad red Ken's propaganda continues.
Every major British Muslim organisation - even those disagreeing with him, such as Imaan, the organisation of lesbian and gay Muslims - believes Qaradawi should be admitted. Whatever his individual views, he is seen as a moderate and is fiercely opposed to al-Qaida. Those believing he should be banned give lip service to treating Britain's Muslim community with respect but in practice deny it. Not only is that wrong itself, but it will increase the number of alienated fanatics.
Harry's Place can prove otherwise.
This man represents Britain's capital to the world and the people of the world must wonder why London keeps this disgraceful lunatic.
If Tony Blair means what he says about stopping preachers of hate, he can start by kicking London's mad mayor out of the Labour party.
If Londoners want to stop the terrorist attacks on their city they can start by forcing their mad mayor to resign.
UPDATE
You can read more of Galloways recent insane ravings here.
Just in case you're still not sure which side Galloway is on, read this:
George Bush doesn't have any civilization, he doesn't represent any civilization. We believe in the Prophets, peace be upon them.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment