US 'losing media war to al-Qaeda'

Thanks to propaganda machines like the BBC.

Take the BBC's lying about events in Iraq for example.

Paul Adams, the BBC's defence correspondent who is based at the coalition command centre in Qatar, complained that the corporation was conveying a untruthful picture of how the war was progressing. [...]

"I was gobsmacked to hear, in a set of headlines today, that the coalition was suffering 'significant casualties'. This is simply not true," Adams said in the memo.

"Nor is it true to say - as the same intro stated - that coalition forces are fighting 'guerrillas'. It may be guerrilla warfare, but they are not guerrillas," he stormed.

"Who dreamed up the line that the coalition are achieving 'small victories at a very high price?' The truth is exactly the opposite. The gains are huge and costs still relatively low. This is real warfare, however one-sided, and losses are to be expected," Adams continued.

Music to al Qaeda's ears no doubt.

And the BBC lied about casualties in Iraq. Sweet music to al Qaeda.

The BBC is so biased they had to order their staff not to participate in anti-war marches.

The flagship of the Royal Navy is the HMS Ark Royal became so disgusted with the one-sided anti-war slant of the BBC that they tuned their television sets to Sky News.

And twice the BBC have been caught using well known anti-war activists to fabricate alleged war crimes by the US in Iraq. See here and here.

Hell, the BBC even claim al Qaeda doesn't exist, that it's a myth created by neocons in Washington.

In the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.

The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media.

The BBC even went so far as to rig a poll against America. The results of the poll were titled 'US is bigger threat than terror.' After a long battle with bloggers the title was changed.

Just how far is the BBC willing to go to support al Qaeda? Well, the BBC hired the editor in chief of al Jazeera to train its reporters. As a result, the BBC no longer uses the word "Terror" or "Terrorist" and the word "Muslim" is only used in a positive context and left out of any negative reporting.

The BBC's veteran reporter, John Simpson, calls al Qaeda the "resistance" and the 7/7 Muslim terrorists "misguided criminals".

In the aftermath of the 7/7 Muslim terror attacks on London, the BBC held a televised debate about how people felt about the attacks. Only problem was,
the BBC stacked the audience with a 5:1 ratio of Muslims to non-Muslims.


The London Telegraph obtained other internal BBC memos and emails. In them, one of BBC’s “most senior news managers,” Hugh Berlyn, criticized BBC’s news reports as untrustworthy, littered with errors, inaccurate and potentially libelous because the corporation’s journalists frequently fail to check their facts, and because BBC often broadcasts these stories without oversight by an editor.

Yes, thanks to the left wing media, like the New York Times, the LA Times, the Guardian and the world's largest propaganda machine the BBC, we are losing the media war to al Qaeda. Just like we did in Vietnam.

Through its lying, spinning, bias and propaganda, the BBC is leading the charge in the media war - for al Qaeda.

Lots more here.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------