Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science. Show all posts
Friday, January 08, 2010
Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Monday, January 04, 2010
Global wamring? What global warming?
From Drudge
East Coast Faces Deep Freeze; Florida Oranges Threatened...
CHILL MAP...
Iowa temps 'a solid 30 degrees below normal'...
Peru's mountain people 'face extinction because of cold conditions'...
Beijing -- coldest in 40 years...
World copes with Arctic weather...
More
Britain returns to work in the grip of the coldest winter for 30 years
East Coast Faces Deep Freeze; Florida Oranges Threatened...
CHILL MAP...
Iowa temps 'a solid 30 degrees below normal'...
Peru's mountain people 'face extinction because of cold conditions'...
Beijing -- coldest in 40 years...
World copes with Arctic weather...
More
Britain returns to work in the grip of the coldest winter for 30 years
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Climategate - Al Gore admits he lied on polar ice - video
Even the Goreacle admits he lied on climate change. Of course he used the political cover word "misspoke".
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
The Green Hypocrites: Prince Charles and Gordon Brown
take separate jets... to lecture the world on global warming
Remember this the next time you see that ad on British TV telling us to just drive 5 miles less to save the planet.
Remember this the next time you see that ad on British TV telling us to just drive 5 miles less to save the planet.
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Science: Another Ice Age?
Time thinks so.
Of course that was before Al Gore came on the scene.
Newsweek sang the same song back then.
Notice how Newsweek added the caveat at the top of this old article now that its been pointed out?
"However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age."
Of course that was before Al Gore came on the scene.
Newsweek sang the same song back then.
"To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down."
Notice how Newsweek added the caveat at the top of this old article now that its been pointed out?
Saturday, December 05, 2009
UN body wants probe of climate e-mail row
Notice how the BBC frame the debate? The "row" isn't a row, it's the biggest scientific scandal of the century. And, it's not just about the emails, it's about the scandal they reveal.
Note the use of "claims" as if there is some doubt about this scandal. No one is making "claims", they're merely pointing to the damning emails where these so called scientists bragged about manipulating the data. Or the one's where they admit to deleting data, damning emails and colluding to keep dissenting scientific views from publication.
But the BBC, along with the few media outlets even reporting on the story, tries to make this about the leakers and try cast doubt on their "claims".
"Claims", "allegations", all words the BBC use to cast doubt on the whole scandal. The police may well be investigating possible hacking, but shouldn't these "scientist" who illegally dodged Freedom of Information requests be prosecuted?
The BBC goes on to try and cast doubt on the scandal without printing any of the emails at the center of the "row". Astounding! After a lengthy report on the greatest scientific scandal of the world, the poor BBC reader is left wondering, "what the hell are they talking about?".
Which is, after all, the point. If the BBC is challenged on why it is not covering the story, it can point to this and say they covered it. Ah, but without informing the public what it's all about.
Here's a report from Canada that does a far better job.
Even comedian, Jon Stewart does a better job than the BBC.
"The head of the UN's climate science body says claims that UK scientists manipulated data on global warming should be investigated."
Note the use of "claims" as if there is some doubt about this scandal. No one is making "claims", they're merely pointing to the damning emails where these so called scientists bragged about manipulating the data. Or the one's where they admit to deleting data, damning emails and colluding to keep dissenting scientific views from publication.
But the BBC, along with the few media outlets even reporting on the story, tries to make this about the leakers and try cast doubt on their "claims".
"The allegations emerged after e-mails written and received by UK climate researchers appeared on the Internet.
The police are investigating whether the scientists' computers were hacked. "
"Claims", "allegations", all words the BBC use to cast doubt on the whole scandal. The police may well be investigating possible hacking, but shouldn't these "scientist" who illegally dodged Freedom of Information requests be prosecuted?
The BBC goes on to try and cast doubt on the scandal without printing any of the emails at the center of the "row". Astounding! After a lengthy report on the greatest scientific scandal of the world, the poor BBC reader is left wondering, "what the hell are they talking about?".
Which is, after all, the point. If the BBC is challenged on why it is not covering the story, it can point to this and say they covered it. Ah, but without informing the public what it's all about.
Here's a report from Canada that does a far better job.
Even comedian, Jon Stewart does a better job than the BBC.
Friday, December 04, 2009
New York Times health care scam
First Climategate and now this. Ever notice how it's always the left making this stuff up?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)