Britain - Guardian Attacks Bloggers

Stung for being caught hiring a Muslim who belongs to a banned (except in Londonistan) terrorist organization, The Guardian attacked the blogger who exposed him and other bloggers who reported on it.

After you read this cry baby article, ask yourself these questions, if this is all much ado about nothing and just an attack by bloggers, why did the Guardian fire Dilpazier Aslam?

And why the need to correct his original story to note his membership in Hizb ut-Tahrir?

The paper will carry a clarification making it clear that Aslam's membership of Hizb ut-Tahrir should have been mentioned in the context of his July 13 article.

Just Google Hizb ut-Tahrir and you'll see why to both questions.

I love how the Guardian headlined Aslam's firing.

Dilpazier Aslam leaves Guardian

Trainee journalist Dilpazier Aslam had his contract with the Guardian terminated today.

The move followed an internal inquiry into Aslam's membership of the political organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir.

A statement said: "The Guardian now believes continuing membership of the organisation to be incompatible with his continued employment by the company."

Which means he shouldn't have been hired in the first place and the bloggers were absolutely right in exposing him. Attacking bloggers for the Guardian's mistake only makes the Guardian look all the more silly, if that were possible.

Contact The Guardian and let them know how stupid they look.

editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 7239 9857
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------